Tuesday’s order, by a three-judge panel of the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, came after the company sued the NLRB in January, seeking to have its structure declared unconstitutional. It sued the day after the agency issued a complaint accusing SpaceX of illegally retaliating by firing eight employees who had circulated an open letter critical of Musk.
A US district court judge last month
Conservative Court
Musk’s companies have repeatedly gone to the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit in their challenges to the NLRB. The 5th, which includes Texas, is regarded as one of the most conservative of the federal appeals courts.
SpaceX headquarters and the NLRB region that brought the case against Musk’s company are both based in California. But SpaceX argued that Texas was an appropriate venue for its lawsuit because its facilities there were disrupted by the ex-employees’ letter and would be affected by the remedies the NLRB is seeking in its complaint.
Read More:
SpaceX didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the appeals court order. But at an NLRB hearing on Tuesday, SpaceX’s lawyer Harry Johnson told an agency judge that the company was weighing its legal options.
“We’re considering what to do at this point” about the order, including whether to ask for the matter to be reconsidered by a larger group of the 5th Circuit’s judges, Johnson said.
The NLRB declined to comment.
California All the Way
On Feb. 15 a federal judge in southern Texas ruled that the case belonged in California rather than in his courtroom. The case “concerns a California administrative proceeding regarding the actions of a California company and its California employees in California,” US District Judge
Tuesday’s one-sentence order itself didn’t offer a rationale, but one of the three judges hearing the case, George W. Bush appointee
The order “permits an erroneous view of the requirements for filing claims in our circuit, risks confusion amongst the district courts of our circuit, and deprives plaintiffs of the opportunity to seek justice in a lawful venue,” Elrod wrote.
One of the two judges in the majority is also a George W. Bush appointee. The other was named to the bench by President Joe Biden.
A lawyer for the fired workers, Laurie Burgess, called SpaceX’s argument meritless.
“We are pleased that the Fifth Circuit has affirmed the lower court decision and rejected SpaceX’s spurious claim to have this matter heard in Texas, an improper venue,” Burgess said.
The case is In re Space Exploration Technologies Corp., 24-40103, 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals.
(Adds details, context and responses in second and third sections.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Jeffrey
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.