An Indiana social worker will face reinstated civil rights claims by parents who say she coerced them into taking their daughter for a blood test, after the Seventh Circuit on Tuesday said the facts were “too murky” to grant qualified immunity.
The US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana was wrong to grant summary judgment for the social worker and her supervisor on the basis of qualified immunity, because there are factual disputes whether the parents consented to the blood draw for their child J.J., the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit said, in an opinion ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.