A petition expected this week will ask the California Supreme Court to settle a renewed debate in the legal malpractice sphere over the level of evidence required to bring a claim against an attorney following a settlement, known as “settle and sue.”
In a case decided in June, Masellis v. Jensen, a state appeals court considered whether a settle and sue plaintiff was held to a more demanding standard of proof than preponderance of the evidence, after a jury found that but for an attorney’s negligence, her client would have obtained a more favorable recovery.
This area of legal ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.