- Senate Judiciary Committee is probing high court ethics issues
- Republicans say partyline subpoenas will destroy Senate panel
Senate Democrats voted to subpoena Texas billionaire
The move came after hours of bickering with Republicans, who claimed the committee’s efforts amounted to a political vendetta against the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair
Democrats said the party-line vote authorizing subpoenas for Crow and Leo was necessary because both men had declined to cooperate with the committee’s requests for information. Crow, a GOP
Leo has played a central role in shaping the Supreme Court’s rightward lurch. Leo helped shepherd through many of the conservative justices sitting on the bench today, orchestrating public relations campaigns to boost their profiles and preparing them for contentious Senate hearings. He helped to mainstream the agenda that, among other things, led to the end of federal abortion rights and increased access to guns in the US.
Durbin, of Illinois, said the two men “are central players in the ethics challenges facing the court.”
‘Stonewalled’ Congress
Durbin claimed Crow and Leo had “stonewalled” Congress after the committee requested
In a statement, Crow’s office said the subpoena was “invalid.”
“Despite the unenforceability of the subpoena, Mr. Crow remains willing to engage with the Committee in good faith, just as he has consistently done throughout this process,” said the statement.
A representative for Leo did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Republicans on the committee pushed back aggressively against the Democrats’ subpoena efforts, filing 177 amendments to the subpoenas in an effort to bog down the process.
“This is garbage,” said South Carolina Senator
Texas Senator
If Leo and Crow defy the subpoenas, the legal fight could get messy – and could ultimately be appealed to the high court itself. Now that the subpoenas are authorized by the committee’s Democratic majority, the panel can either seek civil enforcement of the subpoenas in court – a move that would require a vote of the full Senate – or they could refer the failure to comply directly to the Justice Department for prosecution.
Republicans after the vote questioned whether it was valid under committee rules, which typically require more than two minority-party lawmakers to be present for a vote.
“You have just destroyed one of the most important committees in the United States Senate,” said Texas Republican Senator
Code of Conduct
The Supreme Court adopted a
Senate Majority Leader
“The American people are tired of seeing reports of Supreme Court justices accepting lavish gifts and vacations from billionaires and MAGA extremists, and then these same justices turn around and gut affirmative action, block student loan relief, and so much else,” Schumer said on the Senate floor.
(Updates with Crow statement in seventh paragraph.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Peter Jeffrey
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
