The New York Court of Appeals held May 8 that “merely viewing Web images of child pornography does not, absent other proof, constitute either possession or procurement within the meaning of our Penal Law” (People v. Kent, N.Y., No. 70).
“Some affirmative act is required (printing, saving, downloading, etc.) to show that defendant in fact exercised dominion and control over the images that were on his screen,” the court decided. “To hold otherwise, would extend the reach of article 263 to conduct—viewing—that our Legislature has not deemed criminal,” it said.
The decision overturns a ruling by the intermediate ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.