- Lawyers who argued remotely share their experience
- Barrett confirmation moves apace during election
The Supreme Court’s first argument session of the October 2020 term is in the books, and two of the lawyers who argued in it join the latest episode of “Cases and Controversies” to share their virtual experiences.
Ramzi Kassem of CUNY law school and Sean Marotta of Hogan Lovells recount everything ranging from missing Justice Ginsburg to technical issues to what they ate for breakfast ahead of their pandemic-era remote arguments.
And Bloomberg Law judiciary reporter Madison Alder joins hosts Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin to break down the latest in the high court confirmation process for Amy Coney Barrett, which appears secure for Republicans before the Nov. 3 elections are decided.
Hosts: Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin.
Guests: Ramzi Kassem, Sean Marotta, and Madison Alder.
Producer: David Schultz.
Listen here.
Listen and subscribe to Cases and Controversies from your mobile device:
Via Apple Podcasts | Via Stitcher | Via Overcast | Via Spotify
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
