A restaurant chain’s claim for common law trademark infringement based on a competitor’s use of “ale house” was precluded by a 2000 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that deemed the term generic, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held Dec. 20 (Miller’s Ale House Inc. v. Boynton Carolina Ale House LLC, 11th Cir., 10-15140, 12/20/12).
Prior to reaching its collateral estoppel conclusion, the appeals court sided with the First Circuit, and against the Fifth Circuit, on the issue of whether a trademark owner can theoretically ever re-litigate a previous ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.