A Puma Biotechnology Inc. shareholder who said the company defamed him while fending off his attempt at a proxy takeover saw his $22.35 million jury verdict undone by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Wednesday.
Fredric Eshelman was defamed by a Puma investor presentation suggesting that he’d been involved in a fraudulent clinical trial for a pharmaceutical product, the appeals court said. But his “enormous” jury award—the largest in a defamation suit in North Carolina history—is excessive and not justified by evidence of the harm he suffered, the court said, ordering a new trial to determine ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
