- Pentagon plans to divide the work between Amazon and Microsoft
- Amazon argued that interference from Trump cost it the deal
The Pentagon scrapped a $10 billion cloud-computing contract awarded in 2019 to
“With the shifting technology environment, it has become clear that the JEDI Cloud contract, which has long been delayed, no longer meets the requirements to fill the DoD’s capability gaps,” the Defense Department said in a statement Tuesday. The project, known as the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure and intended as a sole-source contract, had been fiercely disputed from the start.
Instead, the Pentagon announced plans for a “multi-vendor” project and said it “intends to seek proposals from a limited number of sources, namely Microsoft and Amazon Web Services,” the only two companies it deems capable of meeting its requirements. It said other vendors will be considered if they can show they meet the contract terms.
Amazon extended gains on the news, rising 4.7% to $3,675.74 at the close in the biggest jump since Nov. 4. Microsoft was little changed at $277.66.
Amazon applauded the Pentagon’s decision, saying in a statement that the award “was the result of outside influence that has no place in government procurement.”
Microsoft said it understood and respected the decision to drop the contract because the Defense Department would have faced a prolonged court battle. “The security of the United States is more important than any single contract, and we know that Microsoft will do well when the nation does well,” Microsoft said in a blog post.
The future of the JEDI cloud program was thrown into doubt earlier this year when Pentagon officials said they may scrap the contract if the U.S. Court of Federal Claims declined to dismiss Amazon’s claims that political interference from former President
The new cloud contract, dubbed the Joint Warfighter Cloud Capability, will be awarded to multiple vendors for a period of five years. The Defense Department said it hasn’t yet determined a maximum award amount for the replacement cloud project, but expects it to be in the billions of dollars.
Microsoft and Amazon won’t be awarded the deal automatically and will have to submit proposals on how they will satisfy the government’s requirements, according to the Pentagon. Among the requirements the Defense Department is planning to impose are the ability to handle sensitive data at multiple classification levels, global availability of cloud services in tactical environments and enhanced cyber security controls, according to a Pentagon fact sheet.
The prospect of endless litigation wasn’t the driving force behind the Pentagon’s change, said Acting Chief Information Officer
Amazon and Microsoft were notified Tuesday of the new strategy through the Justice Department, which has been defending the Defense Department’s position. “We don’t have agreement yet” with them, although the initial feedback indicated “nothing negative,” Sherman said.
Sherman said that he will be reaching out to
The original contract, with its JEDI acronym, was intended to evoke “Star Wars” imagery. That project, valued at as much as $10 billion over a decade, was intended to serve as the primary data repository for military services worldwide. The Defense Department has said it’s adopting commercial cloud services, in which computing power and storage are hosted in remote data centers run by outside companies, to give it a tactical edge on the battlefield and strengthen its use of emerging technologies.
The Pentagon’s dissolution of the JEDI contract and implementation of a new cloud project offers one of the clearest public validations that Microsoft and Amazon remain the leaders in the cloud services market for the federal government. When Microsoft won the JEDI contract, it was seen as sign the company was catching up to Amazon, with some analysts touting it as possibly “the largest cloud contract award in history.”
Instead of a 10-yr contract, the Pentagon is shifting its contracting strategy to an initial three-year “indefinite order, indefinite quantity” period in which Microsoft, Amazon and possibly others would compete for a still undetermined number of specific “task orders.” The three-year period, which might start in early 2022, would be followed by two, one-year task order option periods. The Pentagon plans to release a new solicitation in October and make an award next year, Sherman said.
Legal Wrangling
Over the years, the contract had invited scrutiny from major tech companies, lawmakers and the White House. The Pentagon’s decision to award the deal to a sole provider, rather than breaking it up into several subcontracts, prompted vigorous behind-the-scenes
In September 2020, Oracle Corp.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that Oracle wasn’t harmed by any errors the Pentagon made in developing the contract proposal because it wouldn’t have qualified for the contract anyway. Oracle has appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court, which hasn’t decided whether to review the case.
Bezos as ‘Enemy’
After Microsoft’s upset victory in October 2019, Amazon Web Services filed a lawsuit asserting that the Defense Department ignored Amazon’s superior technology and awarded the contract to Microsoft despite its “key failures” to comply with requirements. The Pentagon made those errors because of improper interference by Trump, who considered Amazon co-founder
Amazon’s lawsuit relied on a laundry list of comments and actions by Trump and the Defense Department that the e-commerce giant claims shows the Pentagon bowed to political pressure when it awarded the deal to Microsoft. In one case, Amazon cites claims in a book by ex-Defense Secretary
The company also pointed to Trump’s comments during a news conference in July 2019, when he openly
To bolster its case, Amazon asked the court to let it question Trump, former Defense Secretaries Mattis and
In April 2020, the Defense Department’s inspector general
As the
(Updates stock prices in fourth paragraph)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Larry Liebert, Sara Forden
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.