The Fifth Circuit didn’t have jurisdiction to hear a counterclaim by Auto-Dril Inc. that it was fraudulently induced to settle with
Auto-Dril’s fraud claim was a tort claim that fell outside the jurisdiction that the district court retained to interpret and enforce the settlement agreement, the opinion by Judge Carolyn Dineen King said May 12.
After NOV sued Auto-Dril in 2009 for infringing its patent in an oil drill bit, and the parties settled the case in 2011.
In 2015, Auto-Dril sued NOV in another federal court in Texas, asserting a ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
