- Trump alleged Kamala Harris interview was edited to favor her
- Company to pay attorney’s fees, contribute to future library.
Paramount agreed to pay $16 million, including plaintiff’s fees, according to a statement from the company. What’s left will go to a future presidential library. Trump had sought damages of $20 billion. No money will be paid to him directly.
The settlement doesn’t include an apology. The network has agreed to release transcripts of presidential candidate interviews in the future. Although officially unrelated, the settlement is widely viewed as critical for Paramount to gain approval from federal regulators for its pending merger with
Paramount co-Chief Executive Officer
Read More:
Last fall, CBS aired a preview of Harris’s 60 Minutes interview during its Face the Nation news program. The clip featured Harris answering a question about the relationship between the US and Israeli Prime Minister
Trump, who had backed out of his own 60 Minutes interview, alleged in a court filing that the Harris response was “doctored to confuse, deceive, and mislead the American People in order to try and interfere in the election” and that the edit made her appear less incoherent. CBS said in a statement in response to the suit that Face the Nation had used a longer cut of Harris’s answer than 60 Minutes.
“When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate and on point,” CBS said in response. “The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide ranging 21-minute-long segment.”
CBS had been fighting the litigation on multiple fronts, contending that Trump improperly filed it in a federal court in Texas and that the complaint was without merit.
The network’s lawyers argued that the Texas consumer protection law that Trump sued under was designed to protect “consumers engaged in commercial transactions against false, misleading, and deceptive business practices, not to police editorial decisions made by news organizations with which one disagrees.” US Representative
Bloomberg
“This settlement is a cowardly capitulation by the corporate leaders of Paramount, and a fundamental betrayal of 60 Minutes and CBS News,” Rome Hartman, a veteran 60 Minutes producer who worked on the Harris segment, said in a statement to Bloomberg.
“The story that was the subject of this lawsuit was edited by the book and in accordance with CBS News standards,” he said. “Our corporate bosses know that; they know that this lawsuit is completely baseless. But they settled it in order to preserve Shari Redstone’s payday. That is shameful.”
Trump reached
In light of the settlements, critics have argued that news networks and tech companies are kowtowing to Trump in order to preserve access to the White House and protect against retribution.
Carr has also revived FCC investigations into whether CBS, ABC, and
Read More:
(Adds Paramount executive comments in fourth paragraph. An earlier version of this story was corrected to clarify the timing of ABC interview and jury finding Trump liable.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.