Over the last two years, the US Supreme Court achieved two long-sought conservative goals in overturning high-profile legal precedents on abortion rights and affirmative action. Now the court has turned to the third element of its conservative revolution: judicial deference to administrative agencies, known to lawyers as the Chevron doctrine.
Yesterday, the court heard oral arguments about whether to overturn the 1984 case in which it held that, if a statute is ambiguous, the administrative agency tasked with applying the statute gets to say what its legal meaning is — provided the agency’s interpretation is reasonable. The issue is hugely important ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
