A debt collector’s practice of sending consumer information to a commercial mail vendor to generate demand letters could violate federal debt-collection law, because it is considered transmitting private data “in connection with the collection” of a debt, the Eleventh Circuit ruled Wednesday.
Richard Hunstein sued Preferred Collection and Management Services Inc. under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act after the company hired Compumail to produce a demand letter, commonly called a dunning letter, in the course of collecting Hunstein’s medical debt, which he had incurred to Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital for his son’s medical treatment.
Preferred allegedly sent the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.