A federal appeals court blocked a judge from holding a hearing on whether former Homeland Security Secretary
In a 2-1 decision Tuesday, a panel of judges in Washington halted the hearing from going forward, saying the effort by US District Judge
Boasberg has clashed repeatedly with President
The government has argued that the order did not clearly state that the detainees had to be returned to the US. It also contended that the judge has no constitutional authority to compel testimony from current and former government attorneys.
The case stems from the removal of 137 Venezuelans who Trump designated as members of the Tren de Aragua gang under the rarely-used Alien Enemies Act. The administration invoked the war-time power to swiftly deport them to El Salvador. They were later returned to Venezuela and set free.
Trump removed Noem from her position last month after months of controversy and announced he would replace her with Oklahoma Senator
Boasberg’s chambers directed question to Lisa Klem, the court’s spokesperson, who declined to comment.
The decision blocking the contempt hearing was written by Judge
Boasberg’s order at the center of the dispute “said nothing about transferring custody of the plaintiffs and therefore lacks the clarity to support criminal contempt based on the transfer of custody,” Rao wrote.
The dissenting judge,
“Simply put, determining whether there are facts to support probable cause for contempt is not a vindictive or retaliatory exercise,” Childs said. “Nor does fact-finding suggest that the court wishes to intrude in the decision-making of the executive branch.”
The Justice Department urged the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit to block Boasberg from questioning one of its lawyers,
Reuveni alleged that
US lawyers also argued that if the contempt hearing were to proceed, Boasberg would improperly allow lawyers from the
The Justice Department has disputed that Boasberg’s initial, oral order to turn the planes around was a “binding injunction” and argued that the administration complied with his later, written rulings that halted deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.
The case is In re: Donald Trump, 25-5452, US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Steve Stroth
© 2026 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
