Minnesota officials are suing over the “unprecedented surge” of US immigration authorities in the state, taking the Trump administration to court days after a federal agent shot and killed a Minneapolis woman.
In a lawsuit filed Monday, the state accused the Department of Homeland Security and Secretary
The state is arguing that the deployment unconstitutionally violates its sovereignty and is retaliation against its Democratic-elected leadership. Minnesota officials allege the administration’s policies — such as having officers wear masks — violate state laws and that agents are illegally using excessive force and making warrantless arrests of people they suspect aren’t authorized to be in the US.
“Thousands of armed and masked DHS agents have stormed the Twin Cities to conduct militarized raids and carry out dangerous, illegal, and unconstitutional stops and arrests in sensitive public places, including schools and hospitals — all under the guise of lawful immigration enforcement,” state officials wrote in the complaint.
Protests
“President Trump’s job is to protect the American people and enforce the law — no matter who your mayor, governor, or state attorney general is,” DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. “That’s what the Trump administration is doing; we have the Constitution on our side on this, and we look forward to proving that in court.”
Noem
She renewed warnings by senior administration officials that people who try to hamper federal law enforcement risk arrest and criminal prosecution.
The Trump administration is facing allegations similar to Monday’s suit by civilian protesters who have a court hearing Tuesday. Officials in Illinois and Chicago filed their own suit Monday, saying the “menacing, violent, and unlawful incursion” of immigration agents into the area is an illegal attempt to get them to comply with President
Separately, a group of Democratic lawmakers are
“This is a critical moment for oversight, and members of Congress must be able to conduct oversight at ICE detention facilities, without notice, to obtain urgent and essential information for ongoing funding negotiations,” they
The case is Minnesota v. Noem, 26-cv-190, US District Court, District of Minnesota (Minneapolis).
(Updates with DHS spokesperson’s statement in sixth paragraph.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg, Anthony Aarons
© 2026 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.