The drugmaker couldn’t have changed the Fosamax warning any sooner than it did, it told the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a Wednesday brief. The plaintiffs’ claims are barred by impossibility preemption principles because it couldn’t have simultaneously complied with federal and state warning obligations, Merck said.
The plaintiffs suffered fractures before 2010. They allege Merck didn’t warn ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.