The Michigan Supreme Court, after hearing oral arguments last year on the state attorney general’s desire to investigate Eli Lilly & Co.’s insulin pricing practices, will hold another round of arguments in the case.
The justices, whose arguments last October were on whether to accept the case, said April 4 that they were interested in several topics. They include whether Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) sufficiently alleged in a lawsuit that Lilly violated the Michigan Consumer Protection Act and whether that’s necessary to determine whether an exception to the law applies.
- The state’s high court also ordered additional arguments on ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.