The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected their attack on jury instructions concerning whether the country’s top egg producer and two trade groups slashed supplies by recommending cuts, enacting them using animal welfare as a pretext, and intentionally exporting eggs at a loss.
Even if the trial judge should have used the word “or” rather than “and"—to ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.