Welcome back to the Big Law Business column, written by me, Roy Strom. Today, we talk with the CEO of a legal prediction software company about why he thinks judges and lawyers shouldn’t be evaluated in predictive modeling.
Not too long ago, I wrote about a tech start-up that says it knows the best real-life lawyer for appeals of U.S. patent infringement cases.
Sure, the tool itself, called Ex Parte, was interesting. Using technology to predict legal outcomes is a potential game-changer. But there was another story: Some of the lawyers the tool said were the best ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
