- Supreme Court is hearing arguments on strictest curbs in U.S.
- Swing justice questions whether law may curb other rights
Supreme Court Justice
“Can I ask you about the implications of your position for other federal rights?” Kavanaugh said Monday as the court
“We can assume that this will be across the board, equally applicable as the Firearms Policy Coalition says, to all constitutional rights?” Kavanaugh pressed Texas Solicitor General Judd Stone, citing free speech rights and other liberties that could be infringed.
“Your Honor, in several of those circumstances, individuals who were concerned that a lack of immediate pre-enforcement federal court access would cause them ruinous liability or otherwise suppress their ability to exercise those rights have turned to Congress and succeeded,” Stone responded.
“For some of those examples, I think it would be quite difficult to get legislation through Congress,” Kavanaugh said.
He asked Stone to suppose that a law was enacted letting anyone sue a person for using an AR-15 rifle and hold them liable for $1 million.
Stone responded that “whether or not federal court review is available does not turn on the nature of the right.”
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Seth Stern
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.