The US Supreme Court won’t consider how far prison officials can go in further punishing inmates serving time in solitary confinement in an appeal that raised allegations of cruel and unusual punishment.
The case the justices refused to review on Monday centered around Michael Johnson’s claim that his denial of exercise privileges while in isolation for more than three years cumulatively in an Illinois prison was excessive punishment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights.
Limited access to the exercise yard in multiple increments of three, two, and one month stretches were in response to repeated and serious misconduct, which ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
