The Supreme Court nixed a win for Marcel Fashions in its decades-long dispute with Lucky Brand, tossing a novel “defense preclusion” backed by the New York-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Lucky Brand, a jeans maker, can invoke a defense it didn’t in a prior infringement lawsuit because the trademarks at issue and time frame of alleged infringement were different, the high court ruled unanimously.
Res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, prevents a party from relitigating a claim that it did raise or could have raised in earlier litigation. The court declined to say whether claim ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.