The US Supreme Court appeared unconvinced that trying a criminal case in the wrong place precludes prosecuting it again at the correct venue.
Several justices at argument on Tuesday suggested a retrial prohibition went too far in addressing a constitutional requirement that prosecutors bring cases in the district where the crime occurred. It’s a concept referred to as proper venue.
“There are many treatises from the founding era and extending into the 19th century” that support the ability to retry a defendant, Justice Samuel Alito said.
And Justice Clarence Thomas said the normal remedy for constitutional errors is to retry ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.