The justices seemed likely to side with a Texas community college board to affirm a legislative body’s ability to censure a member for unpopular speech without running afoul of the First Amendment.
The justices in particular were concerned that an alternative ruling would inappropriately involve courts in legislative affairs.
Requiring courts to decide how legislative bodies can police their own members would get the judiciary “involved in the rough and tumble of politics,” Justice Clarence Thomas said.
The only question after oral arguments on Tuesday seemed to be how far the court will go—namely, whether they will rule narrowly on ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
