The U.S. Constitution establishes just one requirement for the job of Supreme Court justice: “good Behaviour.” It specifies that members of the country’s top judicial body are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The details were left to lawmakers to work out -- or fight over, as they have pointedly in recent years as conservatives and liberals have battled for dominance in the court. The current rules give Republican President
1. How does Senate confirmation work?
Traditionally, three-fifths of the Senate, or 60 of 100 members, had to agree to end the debate over a Supreme Court nominee and take a final vote. With no party holding that many seats during a Supreme Court confirmation in four decades, the rule had assured at least some bipartisan support for candidates. In 2017, Senate Democrats, who then as now were in the minority, blocked a vote to approve Trump’s first nominee,
2. Why do Democrats say precedent should prevent that?
In February 2016, President Barack Obama, a Democrat in his last year as president, had an opportunity to make a third Supreme Court nomination when conservative Justice
3. Could a justice be confirmed in the time before the election?
The Senate would need to move faster than usual to confirm a nominee that quickly. The process typically involves one-on-one meetings between the nominee and individual senators over many weeks. The Senate Judiciary Committee requires the nominee to complete a lengthy background questionnaire and usually conducts a week of hearings followed by a vote two weeks later in the full Senate. The average time from nomination to Senate vote was 69.6 days for the 15 candidates prior to Kavanaugh, according to a 2018 report from the Congressional Research Service.
The Reference Shelf
- A Congressional Research Service report on related Senate rules.
- The Supreme Court of the United States’s website details its current members, their circuit assignments, audio recordings of oral arguments and information on how to visit the court.
- Martin-Quinn Scores measure the relative locations of the Supreme Court justices on an ideological continuum.
- A Journal of Politics paper: “Predicting Drift on Politically Insulated Institutions: A Study of Ideological Drift on the United States Supreme Court.”
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Lisa Beyer, Elizabeth Wasserman
© 2020 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.