The Ninth Circuit was wrong to imply that a district court can’t rely on a magistrate judge’s decision in determining attorneys’ rates, a Hawaii federal court said Wednesday.
“The Court feels it necessary to submit the following comments solely to emphasize the important role of magistrate judges in establishing a prevailing hourly rate in attorney’s fees disputes,” Judge Alan C. Kay said.
The Ninth Circuit vacated the district court’s calculation of attorneys’ fees in a civil rights case filed by Andrew Namiki Roberts against the City of Honolulu. The fee decision was based “essentially” on a magistrate judge’s conclusion, and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.