The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected the allegations, saying the lawsuit was doomed by its own lack of clarity. The San Francisco-based court pointed to contradictions concerning the legal theories advanced by the stock-photo company, Romania-based Dreamstime.com LLC.
Judge Ronald M. Gould, writing for a unanimous panel, said Dreamstime was stuck with its initial claim that Google acted illegally to maintain its ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.


