“The public interest identified by the government — while understandable — is insufficient to warrant disclosure of grand jury materials at this time,” Maxwell’s lawyers wrote in a letter Tuesday to US District Judge
The Trump administration last month asked a pair of federal judges in New York to permit release of transcripts for the proceedings of grand juries that indicted Epstein and Maxwell given public interest in the case. The judges gave the estate of Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial, and Maxwell until today to respond to the government’s proposal, as well as any victims who wished to give their perspective.
Epstein’s estate took no position on the unsealing request. But Maxwell argued that public interest “cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain.” Maxwell’s lawyers said her case is currently
Victims’ Statements
Some of Epstein’s victims have also
Annie Farmer, one of the Epstein victims that
“Ms. Farmer is thankful for the Court’s invitations to state the victims’ positions, and supports the unsealing of the grand jury transcripts, as well as the accompanying grand jury exhibits, with redactions only as necessary to protect victims’ names, likenesses, and identifying information,” her lawyers wrote. “Transparency is critical to justice, and the public has a legitimate interest in understanding the full scope of Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes, particularly where those actions caused lasting harm to others.”
Maxwell met last month with Deputy Attorney General
President
Maxwell’s lawyers said she has never had a chance to review the grand jury materials in her case and doesn’t know what is in them.
“Disclosure of grand jury materials at this stage risks irreparably tainting the legal process by injecting sealed testimony into the public debate while judicial review is ongoing,” her attorneys said. They added that the harm from releasing the materials would be “severe and irrevocable” and would “inevitably influence” any future legal proceedings if Maxwell succeeds in her appeal.
The case is US v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
(Updates with victims’ statements.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.