A federal appeals court judge published what he described as the opinion “that should have been issued” to his dissent in a death penalty case, in a move attorneys say marks a departure from typical practice.
Judge Jerry E. Smith of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, a Reagan appointee, wrote in a one-page dissent Monday that the majority’s decision — which preserved a pause on a Texas man’s scheduled execution — “is grave error.”
But in an unusual move, rather than elaborate in that dissent, he instead attached an opinion styled as a majority ruling, which ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.