The Environmental Protection Agency’s nine month delay of the Trump administration’s revised drinking water regulations for lead and copper didn’t harm Arizona, Louisiana, and three other states, and the decision was reasonable, the agency told the D.C. Circuit.
The states’ argument against the delay “is, at heart, a disagreement with EPA’s policy judgment,” according to the brief in the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. And a disagreement “cannot justify striking down the rule,” the agency told the court Tuesday.
The original drinking water rule was issued to reduce lead contamination in tap water. Trump administration officials issued ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.