- Government argued appeal should go faster to speed Trump probe
- Trump had sought to slow the appeal, citing records review
A federal appeals court granted the US Justice Department’s request to expedite its challenge to the appointment of a so-called special master to review thousands of White House documents seized from
The order Wednesday from the 11th Circuit US Court of Appeals didn’t immediately specify when arguments would happen -- or which judges would hear them -- but set a briefing schedule that wraps up on Nov. 17.
Trump’s legal team had opposed putting the case on a faster track,
“Having consulted with the Chief Judge, the appeal will be assigned to a special merits panel from the classified appeals log randomly selected by the Clerk,” the court wrote. “That panel will decide when and how to hear oral argument.”
The appeals court gave Trump until Nov. 10 to file his brief, six more days than the government had proposed but less time than Trump’s lawyers wanted. The government brief is due Oct. 14.
The order is the latest setback for Trump before the appeals court, which earlier rejected his attempt to keep the Justice Department from accessing about 100 documents bearing classification markings -- some of them labeled top secret -- that were seized from his home. DOJ argued the documents were key to its ongoing criminal probe into Trump’s handling of White documents.
US District Senior Judge
The government told Dearie Wednesday that the parties successfully signed a contract with a third-party vendor to perform the crucial task of scanning and uploading the documents as part of the special-master review. The process was delayed after multiple proposed vendors told the government they were “
US District Judge
Cannon’s order appointing the special master temporarily bars the government from using most of the seized documents.
The case is Trump v. US, 22-13005, 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals (Atlanta).
(Updates with parties finding vendor to scan seized documents.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
© 2022 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.