The
Lawyers in the Justice Department filed a friend-of-the-court brief Friday, arguing that his conviction last year was improper. They said the trial judge in the so-called hush money case failed to account for the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling that gave the president broad immunity.
Trump is appealing a
The Justice Department argued that some evidence shouldn’t have been considered in the trial because it involved Trump’s time in office.
“The trial court allowed the prosecution to present evidence of President Trump’s official acts to the jury,” the US wrote. “That error requires reversal.”
The Justice Department argued that Judge
Federal lawyers now have “substantial interests in protecting the Office of the President,” as well as its powers and duties, according to the filing, which asks the state appeals court to consider their arguments as they weigh the case.
“This is the first appeal on the merits from a criminal conviction of a President in the Nation’s history,” the Justice Department wrote in the filing. “The United States therefore has a substantial interest in the Court’s resolution of President Trump’s immunity defense.”
A spokesperson for
Merchan also improperly allowed Bragg to take a misdemeanor case — falsifying business records — and elevate it to a felony by saying it was done to violate a second law. That law, the Federal Election Campaign Act, can’t be used in this case, according to the filing.
The jury agreed with Manhattan prosecutors that the concealed payments had deprived voters of vital information about Trump’s conduct with women before the election, which Trump won.
“Reversal is also required for the independent reason that the trial court permitted the jury to find President Trump guilty based on a legal theory expressly preempted by federal law,” according to the filing.
In Trump’s separate federal challenge to the case, a US appeals court in Manhattan this week ruled that Trump can get a fresh review of his request to move the state case to federal court. Trump’s legal team has prioritized the federal appeals court as the quickest route to get the case in front of the Supreme Court.
Trump’s lead defense lawyer at the hush-money trial,
A spokesperson for the Justice Department didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
(Updates with more context from the filing starting in paragraph 5.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Anthony Aarons
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.