A defendant who pleaded guilty to child pornography charges after truthfully answering his probation officer’s questions about the contents of his phone is entitled to a habeas corpus hearing to determine whether his lawyers were ineffective by not arguing his Fifth Amendment rights were violated, the Eleventh Circuit said Wednesday.
The issue boiled down to whether it was reasonable for Denzil McKathan to believe he was in a classic penalty situation, requiring him to either answer his probation officer’s questions truthfully or have his release revoked, the opinion by Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum said.
As conditions of his supervised release ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
