The Federal Circuit revived a footwear company’s claim accusing
USA Dawgs Inc. argued Crocs misled consumers and gained market share in violation of the Lanham Act by touting its Croslite foam as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive,” when in fact the foam material wasn’t ever covered by a patent and was “used by many footwear companies around the world.”
The Colorado judge tossed the case, agreeing with Crocs’ argument that the claim was really ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.