Crocs Inc. urged the US Supreme Court to stomp out a false advertising suit based on the company’s promotional statements about its “patented” foam material.
In a petition docketed Tuesday with the high court, Crocs said an appeals court erred in extending the Lanham Act’s prohibition on misrepresenting the nature, characteristics or qualities of a good “to misrepresentations about the product’s intangible properties, like its patent status.” The company said the appellate courts that have weighed in on the issue are divided, creating a circuit-split with the Second, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits deeming statements about intangible attributes of products not ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.