- Judge Mark Wolf questioned judiciary handling of complaints
- Judiciary declined to share some records with Senate committee
A federal judge who raised concerns more than a decade ago about how the US court system handled ethics complaints against Supreme Court Justice
US District Judge
Bloomberg News
Whitehouse in recent weeks has
Thomas has said he was advised by unnamed individuals that he wasn’t required to report the trips with Crow, whom he described as a close friend. Crow has said he never sought to influence Thomas and disputed anything nefarious in the unreported financial transactions described by ProPublica.
In 2011, Congressional Democrats and public interest groups filed complaints with the Judicial Conference following reports that Thomas failed to disclose years of income earned by his wife Ginni Thomas; they also urged an investigation into private plane travel he received from Crow. The complaints were referred to a committee responsible for enforcing financial reporting rules, which cleared Thomas of “willful” wrongdoing.
Wolf, who was appointed to the federal bench in Massachusetts by President
Under federal law, the conference must refer cases to the US attorney general if there’s “reasonable cause” to believe a judge “willfully” violated the disclosure rules. By being kept in the dark, the body was potentially being prevented from carrying out its duty, Wolf wrote in 2012 letters to the conference. His protest didn’t affect the Thomas finding but prompted the financial disclosure committee to adopt a new policy of reporting “written public allegations of willful misconduct” to the leadership body.
Wolf did not immediately respond to a request for comment about his Senate appearance and what he intends to tell the committee. His 2012 letters, which were reviewed by Bloomberg News, were not included in a set of documents that the Judicial Conference provided to Whitehouse earlier this week. The documents did include part of a March 2013 internal report that summarized Wolf’s concerns and the later policy change.
US District Judge
Mauskopf also defended the financial disclosure committee’s 2011 actions, noting its leaders on several occasions went beyond standard procedure to tap a compliance subcommittee for additional review. After hearing Wolf’s concerns, the committee determined it didn’t need to amend its earlier reports but did separately provide notice to the Judicial Conference about its handling of the Thomas complaints. No other conference member raised concerns about the ethics review process, Mauskopf added.
(Updates with additional information from Judge Mauskopf’s letter to Senator Whitehouse.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Anthony Lin
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.