- Immigration increase harms environment, state argues
- No proof unfinished wall increased immigration, judge said
Arizona told the Ninth Circuit it should reverse a judge’s order and block the Biden administration from ending border wall construction and implementing other related policies because they would increase immigration and harm the environment.
The state challenges a “collection of policies” that it says have the “direct effect of causing growth in the population” in the U.S. and Arizona. The federal government violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to consider increased air emissions, the effects on wildlife and protected species, and the “proliferation of garbage,” the state says.
Arizona told the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona that the federal government was required to prepare an environmental impact statement before proceeding with the policies. But the state can’t “characterize a ‘mish-mash’ of actions by two different federal agencies as a unitary program,” the court said Feb. 7.
Arizona failed to show that ending border wall construction will increase immigration, according to the ruling. The canceled projects affect 18 miles of territory at most, leaving a number of areas along the Arizona border with no barrier, the court said.
The state also failed to acknowledge that people entering the U.S. have “time and again found ways to overcome and bypass walls on the southern border,” the court said.
Judge Dominic W. Lanza issued the order. The state will challenge that decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, according to a notice filed April 8.
The Arizona Attorney General’s Office represents the state. The Department of Justice represents the federal government.
The case is Arizona v. Mayorkas, D. Ariz., No. 2:21-cv-00617, 4/8/22.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.