- Ruling withstands Treasury policy ending domestic enforcement
- Reporting companies expected compliance costs near $22 billion
A band of Michigan business owners, nonprofits, and limited liability companies demonstrated that the Corporate Transparency Act violated their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search, a Michigan federal judge ruled.
The Small Business Association of Michigan’s case hasn’t been made moot by the Treasury’s announcement, which wasn’t a matter of record, Jonker’s opinion said.
“The CTA’s reporting requirements reach indiscriminately across the smallest players in the economy to extract and archive a trove of personal data explicitly for future law enforcement purposes at an expected cost to the reporting players of almost $22 billion in the first year alone,” Jonker said.
Jonker compared the law’s data collection as comparable to “Big Brother,” a symbol of government overreach in George Orwell’s 1949 dystopian novel “1984.”
The law is an anti-money laundering measure that requires businesses to file reports to Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, disclosing the identities of individuals who own or control the company.
Proponents call it a vital tool for combating illicit financial schemes, like drug trafficking and tax evasion, which use anonymous shell companies. But businesses were quick to sue, calling it a unconstitutional overreach.
“The CTA may have good intentions but the road it chooses to pursue them paves over all reasonable limits,” Jonker said.
Miller, Johnson, Snell & Cummiskey PLC represents the Small Business Association of Michigan.
The case is Small Bus. Ass’n of Mich. v. Yellen, W.D. Mich., No. 1:24-cv-00314, 3/3/25.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.