Immigration judges don’t have to explicitly say when they find an asylum seeker’s story not credible, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a loss for immigrants challenging how their cases are reviewed.
In a unanimous opinion on Tuesday authored by Neil Gorsuch, the justices sided with the government in reversing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which applied a standard that said courts must accept an immigrant’s version of events absent a clear finding that the story isn’t credible.
The Supreme Court stressed that the standard under federal law for reviewing credibility is “highly deferential” to Justice ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.


