The US appeals court that earlier this week allowed President
The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on Friday issued a so-called administrative stay on an Oct. 20
In the meantime, a full complement of appellate judges will consider holding a so-called en banc rehearing to review whether the 2-1 decision was correct on the law. Oregon requested the rehearing, as did the dissenting judge who said it was a dangerous decision.
“This administrative order expresses no views on the merits of this matter and is not a reconsideration of the earlier stay order,” Senior Circuit Judge
The Portland dispute comes as Trump continues to tout his plans to bring state National Guard troops under federal control and send them into Democratic-led cities where he claims violent protesters are impeding the activities of US immigration agents. Similar suits are challenging Trump’s deployments to Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and Chicago.
Oregon argues a rehearing is warranted because the 2-1 ruling was wrong on the law. Friday’s order suggests the appeals court will complete its vote on whether to hold the review by Oct. 28, a day before the start of three-day trial in Portland on the merits of Oregon’s suit challenging the deployment.
The Portland is being being overseen by US District Judge
The case is State of Oregon vs. Donald Trump, 3:25-cv-01756, US District Court, District of Oregon (Portland).
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth, Sara Forden
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
