The group of creators argued that YouTube LLC discriminated against their videos based on their sexual orientation or gender identity by removing and restricting the visibility of their content on the platform despite YouTube’s public expressions of viewpoint neutrality.
But those public statements don’t constitute a contractual obligation, or an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, wrote Magistrate Judge
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
