Video rental firm Netflix knew or should have known that the personal data of a putative class of some 500,000 subscribers was not properly protected from disclosure when it provided allegedly “anonymized” data sets on their viewing habits to third parties as part of a research contest, according to a complaint filed Dec. 17, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Doe v. Netflix Inc.).
The complaint alleged that California-based Netflix failed to live up to privacy protection promises it made to customers in privacy and data security policies posted online when, in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.