Judge
Davila, who sits on the US District Court for the Northern District of California, said he would give the plaintiffs one final opportunity to amend and refile their complaint “out of an abundance of caution.”
“It is doubtful whether Plaintiffs can sufficiently plead their dismissed claims given the deficiencies addressed in this Order,” he said.
The plaintiffs in 2024 already advanced other claims in their suit that allege violations of Illinois, New Jersey, and New York consumer protection law, breach of express contract, and unjust enrichment.
The plaintiffs seek to represent a class of users who disabled data collection in the “Share Device Analytics” setting on their iPhone or iPad.
The lawsuit alleges Apple misled users into believing that disabling data collection settings would prevent Apple’s proprietary, in-house apps from collecting data on their personal information and app activity. Apple continued the collection, the suit alleged.
Lynch Carpenter LLP and Bursor & Fisher PA represent the plaintiffs. Covington & Burling LLP represent Apple.
The case is In Re : Apple Data Priv. Litig., N.D. Cal., No. 5:22-cv-07069, 1/20/26.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
