Woman Trainer Didn’t Show Sex Bias by Agency, 11th Cir. Says (1)

Sept. 24, 2025, 3:16 PM UTCUpdated: Sept. 24, 2025, 5:32 PM UTC

The Eleventh Circuit upheld an Alabama federal court’s decision that a third-party staffing company did not discriminate against an athletic trainer who was transferred from her position at a high school.

The three-judge panel said in a Wednesday ruling that ATI Holdings LLC, a rehabilitation services provider, didn’t violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by reassigning a female athletic trainer to a new post and replacing her with a male trainer.

The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit said there was a genuine factual dispute as to whether ATI had sufficient control over the trainer ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.