The Eleventh Circuit upheld an Alabama federal court’s decision that a third-party staffing company did not discriminate against an athletic trainer who was transferred from her position at a high school.
The three-judge panel said in a Wednesday ruling that ATI Holdings LLC, a rehabilitation services provider, didn’t violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by reassigning a female athletic trainer to a new post and replacing her with a male trainer.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit said there was a genuine factual dispute as to whether ATI had sufficient control over the trainer ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.