The online review platform’s investor has adequately alleged that Yelp’s decision to defer an investigation acts as a rejection of the pre-suit demand and isn’t entitled to deference, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California said.
The shareholder made a required pre-suit demand on Yelp’s board, and the board “deferred making a final decision” until after the conclusion of a related securities class suit rather ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.