- Ex-CEO of grocery chain testifies Holmes was charismatic
- Judge ruled it’s unfair for jury to learn how much was spent
Former
That Burd’s vision never materialized before his 20-year tenure at Safeway ended was meant by prosecutors as an object lesson for the jury in
The first company chief executive to testify at the trial, now in its second month, Burd was a self-described turnaround expert who consulted for
Jurors weren’t given all the details about what Burd referred to as his “wellness play.” The judge initially ruled that airing the $400 million figure cited by prosecutors might create unfair prejudice against Holmes, but an email presented as evidence by her lawyers Tuesday afternoon revealed that $275 million of the outlay was for remodeling stores. The jury learned enough about Burd’s frustration with chronic delays in the planned rollout to surmise that it never got off the ground.
Echoing the
Based on a pitch from Holmes, Burd said, Safeway entered a contract with her startup in 2010 to retrofit its stores to build patient service centers where customers could get the results from Theranos blood analyzers within 30 minutes. Customers could get tested, do their grocery shopping, get their results and a prescription filled in one stop, he said.
“I wanted to build a network for this new lab company that would give me another stream of income,” Burd said. “This notion of getting results and prescriptions filled before leaving the store, we knew that would be appealing to customers.”
Jurors were shown a series of emails between Burd and Holmes showing the Safeway CEO growing increasingly impatient and irritated with delays. In November 2012, Burd wrote to Holmes saying “I feel like a jogger running in place waiting for the stop light to turn green.”
“I was disappointed,” Burd testified. “The dates just kept getting pushed back.”
Importantly, apart from a discussion of problems stemming from the stacking of Theranos machines producing too much heat, Burd said he heard nothing from Holmes about any technological problems. Theranos insiders have previously testified the machines were beset with myriad performance problems and failures.
“I was never told there was a technology problem with the box itself,” Burd said under questioning from a lawyer for Holmes, referring to the Theranos machine.
By the time Burd stepped down in 2013, he testified, Theranos machines had never been installed in Safeway and apart from one trial location no customers had ever been tested.
Prosecutors called as their next witness
Holmes is charged with lying to patients and investors about the potential and accuracy of Theranos blood-testing machines and the financial well-being of the company. She has pleaded not guilty but faces as long as 20 years in prison if convicted.
(Updates with next witness, former Walgreens CFO)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.