The automaker’s investors challenged statements related to the Tesla Model 3, but a safe harbor provision in federal securities law protects some of the assertions, and the investors didn’t adequately plead falsity as to others, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said.
The investors accused Tesla of announcing and repeatedly reaffirming Model 3 production goals the company knew it wouldn’t be ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.