A group of investors who lost money in the $7 billion R. Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme lost their bid to hold two financial services firms liable because the firms didn’t control Stanford’s company, according to a Louisiana federal district judge’s ruling.
The investors, who opted out of an earlier class suit that wound up in the same court, “emphasize[d] the ‘intensely factual’ nature of determining whether a party is a control person, but ultimately fail[ed] to provide evidence that would include such facts,” the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana said Jan. 24. The court shut down ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.