The investors took issue with several Six Flags statements about its plans and partnership with a Chinese firm after the new parks didn’t pan out. But they didn’t sufficiently plead an actionable misstatement or omission, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas said.
The investors failed to “challenge the inactionability of numerous statements” when they responded to the company’s motion to ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.