Investors accused the photography and personalized products retailer of misleading them in a proxy statement intended to secure approval for the merger. But the challenged valuation range statement wasn’t misleading, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said in an unpublished opinion.
There’s “no cause of action” because Shutterfly’s only statements of fact were that its financial advisor, Morgan Stanley, calculated the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.